9 Oct
2004
9 Oct
'04
8:33 p.m.
At 06:38 PM 10/8/2004, Stefan Slapeta wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
[...]
That was meant read:
buf.actime = std::time(0)
funny :)
Now, it may be a poor design to update actime to the current time. It might be better to do a stat(), and get st_atime, and then use that. Opinions?
IMO the really poor design is that of ::utime which forces you to set both the access time and the write time in the same call;
Yes, that's for sure.
I'm afraid you have no choice but to determine the actual access time before (as you suggested) :(
I've committed the changes to CVS. Thanks, --Beman