Tom Brinkman wrote:>
While I'm sure that your concerns are valid about this library in its current state, i've found this library to be good enough. It may not be perfect, but its a better rectangle class than any i've seen. I think that we should get it reviewed by others and try to get it added to the main boost cvs. When an improved geometry class comes along, we could add that one to boost as well. Geometry2d is not a complicated library, as it consists of only one header file, and would be easy enough to just add it to the utility folder.
It might be a worthwhile idea. If you are interested enough to pursue it on your own, you have my support/permission to take over the code. I'd explicitly query the interest/level of acceptance for the idea on this list before doing anything, though. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering