17 Aug
2006
17 Aug
'06
12:50 p.m.
"Hubert Holin" <Hubert.Holin@lmd.polytechnique.fr> wrote in message news:loom.20060817T140855-29@post.gmane.org...
Johan Råde <rade <at> maths.lth.se> writes:
Output is consistent with C99. (In particular, negative NaN is written as "-nan".
Paris (U.E.), le 17/08/2006
Bonjour
*Negative* Not-A-Number? What is such a beast, and what should it be used for?
It suggests to me a saturation in the negative direction, IOW a number less than -std::numerics<T>::max(). An example use might be when you have an error integrator in a positional servo system, but I don't know if that is the effect here. regards Andy Little