7 Jul
2009
7 Jul
'09
5:14 a.m.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jeffrey Bosboom<jbosboom@uci.edu> wrote:
I think the solution might be to have a process where libraries that sit unmaintained for some period of time can be adopted by someone else. (Not that people necessarily want to do maintain someone's library, but if someone using the library is applying patches on their local copy anyway, maybe they'd like to be the maintainer.)
--Jeffrey Bosboom
Small question possibly big discussion: Do all libraries need a specific maintainer? Tony