On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:33:36 -0600 (MDT), Dave Gomboc <dave@cs.ualberta.ca> wrote:
Yes, I agree that read and write are better, because of the "portability" of the names to non-sockets that it gives. I've wanted to make that change for some time, but the thing that has been preventing me is what to call the datagram functions sendto and recvfrom, as writeto and readfrom don't seem quite right. Any suggestions?
I don't perceive what's wrong with "write_to" and "read_from".
Dave
P.S. I saw in another Boost posting a poster using email address sid@6581.com. It's nice to see that there's other C=64 oldtimers out there! ;-)
Nice to see that someone recognizes my address. Most people ask what it means. :) www.6581.com might bring back some memories for you. (Works best in IE.) -- Be seeing you.