
29 May
2006
29 May
'06
11:34 p.m.
Here are results for cvs head version with your modification, which show that your analysis was correct:
It would be interesting to see how your results compare to Google's (open source) hash map: http://goog-sparsehash.sourceforge.net/ http://goog-sparsehash.sourceforge.net/doc/performance.html I've not used them but they seem to give some good improvements (memory or speed, but not both) over std_hash and std_map. Darren