Re: [boost] [preprocessor] use case: named parameters for macros

Aristid Breitkreuz wrote:

Hi,

for short: I hereby provide a sample implementation with (possibly) room for optimization and sub-optimal macro names. Consider it a proof of concept and further inspiration.

If there is demand, I can license it permissively.

Does the Boost license work? Your work will be acknowledged, of course. <code> Very nice! Quite expansion-heavy, but it isn't problematic according to my benchmarks. Thanks, Tobias