Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?

Sohail Somani <sohail <at> taggedtype.net> writes:

Anyway, I haven't looked back yet and (sorry) I'm not sure I will. Google Mock itself is unbelievably useful.

Frankly, I can't see what the fuss is all about. An approach taken by Boost.Test is marginally better in my opinion. Mocks are deterministic and test case should not need to spell out expectations. Writing mocks is just as easy. You can see an example here: .../libs/test/example/logged_exp_example.cpp There is a potential for some improvement, but it is already better than anything else I know (IMO obviously). Gennadiy