5 May
2005
5 May
'05
12:59 p.m.
Peter Dimov wrote:
Dave Harris wrote:
It sounds like you are mimicking the "foreach" of some other language. I think a C++ library should use C++ conventions, not the conventions of whatever it is you are copying.
The C++ 'foreach' is likely to be spelled 'for', if I'm not mistaken.
for( int v: c ) { }
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1650.html#85
Well, in that case, I suggest that BOOST_FOREACH be spelled: BOOST_FOR Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net