13 Sep
2008
13 Sep
'08
12:36 a.m.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Sohail Somani <sohail@taggedtype.net> wrote:
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
What if Boost.Config did something like:
#if !defined(BOOST) # define BOOST boost #endif
And we replace all uses of the boost namespace with BOOST?
Not all boost headers include boost/config.hpp.
Is that really a problem?
#include <boost/config/namespace.hpp>
In principle, personally, I'm against making any header mandatory. But also, if someone asks you to integrate a statically linked library that used a version of the standard library different from the one you were using, what would you do? :) Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode