Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [typeindex v3.0] Peer review begins Mon 21st ends Wed 30th

On 24/04/2014 04:56, quoth Klaim - Joël Lamotte:

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Nat Goodspeed wrote:

...

I don't suppose boost::typeindex would be an improvement? That name at least immediately suggests to the reader which library to look up.

In my opinion, even boost::typeidx would be an improvement over boost::typeind.

+1 to boost::typeindex. (And +0.5 to boost::typeidx.) boost::typeind makes me think "type indirection" or "type indeterminate". Which I suppose isn't an entirely bad association under the circumstances, but is probably not what was intended.