6 Nov
2009
6 Nov
'09
1:13 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> wrote:
No new stuff should be accepted until it passes warning free, for a start.
I don't think that'd be fair, at least not for both gcc and visual c++. Some of the onus to fix a compiler's warnings should be on the people who care about that compiler.