15 Jan
2015
15 Jan
'15
11:21 a.m.
On 15 Jan 2015, at 12:04, Павел Кудан <coodan@mail.ru> wrote:
There is also another kind of misconception in description (and behaviour) of same /= operator of boost interval class.
I can prove it if you will agree that [-inf, inf] is not empty interval at any rate :)
The meaning of [-inf,inf] as the interval in which the answer will be requires that there is an answer in the first place. You should no use a different definition other than the boost definition if you want to validate the boost implementation. If you don't then there is a bug in your way of thinking.