On Sunday, July 17, 2011 03:05:40 PM Rene Rivera wrote:
On 7/17/2011 11:48 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
on Sat Jul 16 2011, Rene Rivera<grafikrobot-AT-gmail.com> wrote: The priority should be on convenience for reviewers rather than for submitters, as there are hopefully many more of the former than the latter. As a reviewer, I really want to be able to review all of the code and documentation on the web. I'd also like the source to be presented in a SCM repository to ease integration of review commentary, etc. For me, this all points toward using a public repo hosting service like GitHub.
+1; In a dream world there would be a project hosting service that would allow many types of SCM clients to get the code regardless of what the author used to put the code in with.
FWIW, github lets you checkout and commit through svn: https://github.com/blog/626-announcing-svn-support and https://github.com/blog/644-subversion-write-support