17 Jun
2004
17 Jun
'04
12:09 p.m.
"Ken Hagan" <K.Hagan@thermoteknix.co.uk> wrote in message news:carmco$8f6$1@sea.gmane.org... | Regarding std::complex<> | | At http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html ... | | Issue 387 (std::complex over-encapsulated) seems to be what you are | referring to and the final remark is... | | "The LWG believes that C99 compatibility would be enough | justification | for this change even without other considerations. All existing | implementations already have the layout proposed here." | | ...but I don't know the time-scale for things like this being adopted, | even if (for the sake of argument) everyone thinks its a good idea. Well, at least for C++0x this would be resolved. br Thorsten