12 Dec
2024
12 Dec
'24
6:58 a.m.
Le mercredi 11 décembre 2024 à 19:31 +0200, Peter Dimov via Boost a écrit :
You've already stated that you don't think copy construction should be required. But copy construction is required by the current implementation of hash_append_unordered_range.
The way you phrase it make it sounds like it could be implemented without requiring copy construction. Is that poor understanding from my side? Or would it incurs some other penalty (e.g. performance) if that requirement held and hash_append_unordered_range was implemented without requiring copy construction? In the latter case I think it would be worth explaining in the documentation. Regards, Julien