16 May
2014
16 May
'14
9:09 a.m.
On May 16, 2014 3:48:13 AM EDT, Stephen Kelly
Niall Douglas wrote:
I'd forget about modularising compatibility Boost, it is what it is.
Given that no one else responded on this point, it seems conclusive: Boost doesn't want to make any steps (which I previously showed to be possible) toward a goal of modularizing the code before the big bang described above.
A more reasonable conclusion is that Boost wants to get its head above water, following the Git transition, before taking on more disruptive changes. Nevertheless, it would be easier to accept such a change add part of a new and separate branch. ___ Rob (Sent from my portable computation engine)