26 Nov
2006
26 Nov
'06
10:10 p.m.
On 11/25/06 8:51 AM, "Mathias Gaunard" <mathias.gaunard@etu.u-bordeaux1.fr> wrote:
Daryle Walker wrote:
This is something I've been working on for the past few months.
Why not wrap a known and robust library instead of making a new one?
1. AFAIK, all those known & robust libraries already have wrappers 2. This type is more of a theoretical class than something that can compete against the "big boys". Having an adjustable radix alone is an indication of that. 3. I always thought that this idea was neat, and always wanted to make such a class ever since I heard of C++, even though I'm definitely not the first. -- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com