On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 5:58 PM, vicente.botet <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
From: "Thorsten Ottosen" <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> "I guess The old behavior could be supplied in <boost/range/deprecated/iterator_range.hpp> in namespace boost::deprecated. Again, it is a matter of time."
Is this a good compromise for all?
This is fine with me. But one thing more... While we're at it, could we please have something like the Range concept definitions that were established in the review/release for 1.32, i.e. something with empty(r), size(r), etc. They are a superset of the requirements in the current definitions, so reintroducing them won't effect code that was written since their untimely demise in 1.35. If time is an issue and you need help, just ask. Even though, lately, I've been shamefully slow at submitting code, I might be able to pitch in. Daniel Walker