At Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:03:31 +0000, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
At Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:46:35 +0100, Roland Bock wrote:
A question from a user and occasional contributor to the overflowing bug tracker, hoping that you can provide an answer without compromising the dramatics for BoostCon :-)
How could decentralization influence the overflowing bug tracker?
A very good question. The most obvious thing is that projects could all choose their own issue tracking systems, so nobody needs to be bogged down by the slowness of a single Trac instance or tied to the current stagnation of the Trac development effort.
David,
Could you give a few more details on how it would be organized at boost.org?
Exactly how Boost would be mapped onto ryppl is an open question, though I have some specific ideas.
Does it mean each library will organize hosting, domain, etc. on its own. Or, all libraries will still be hosted under at boost.org and accessible through subdomain, test.boost.org, asio.boost.org, etc.
I think that's up to us. Ryppl will allow either system, or something else. -- Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com