21 Aug
2014
21 Aug
'14
4:31 p.m.
On 8/21/2014 9:08 AM, Peter Dimov wrote:
Andrey Semashev wrote:
Stated differently, were the changes driven by any kind of user demand?
Well, there was this ticket:
Yes, I know. You'll note that it cites no reasons for the change and provides no examples of noncopyable's supposed inadequacy. It's just "C++11 is shiny, let's make use of it!"
Dammit, this thread makes me mad. A totally pointless change that broke a bunch of stuff. When will people learn? </rant>