Re: [boost] [qvm] Terseness of syntax etc.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:

...

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Phil Endecott < spam_from_boost_dev@chezphil.org> wrote:

...

I find most of the identifiers too short. You use r and w for read and write access [...]. I know, short names. :) template <int I> static float r( float3 const & ); template <int I> static float & w( float3 & );

Isn't the traditional get/set a good middle-ground between terseness and expressiveness? My $0.02. --DD

It's not get/set semantics, it's read/write. Maybe I should call them read_access/write_access. Emil