Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Shunsuke Sogame wrote:
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Shunsuke Sogame wrote:
Thorsten Ottosen wrote: FWIW, after combating Range and FOREACH, my qualityless ranges are here: http://tinyurl.com/lebuq I can see you have picked up on the idea of range adaptors which I'm also baking. I'll definitely have a look.
Rightly or wrongly, temporary container of iterators seems to increase range adaptor candidates. Actually 'sort_range/sorted' becomes essential part of my code.
are these it different from in-place sorting?
'sorted' doesn't modify its left argument, instead it creates and sorts temporary container of iterators. I don't know for sure whether such adaptor is legal or not.
And btw, wasn't it you who made some MFC implementation of ranges?
With your permission, I would like to include that in the library.
Though it was interesting work, I have never used them except for CSimpleArray. :-( I did think they were legacy and unrecommended while implementing. They are now sleeping here... http://tinyurl.com/qucoa
Ok, there would need to be some test along with these, other wise I can't include them.
Another question is: does it work with vc6+, vc7+, or vc7.1+ ?
vc7.1+. I guess Boost.Range non-intrusive customization doesn't support vc6/7. I will try to simplify the header structure and move them to boost/range/detail/mfc. I can maybe... promise, if they are really wanted. :-( Apart from mfc, I think users (and I) hope some runtime test functions are written by professionals (like range/concepts.hpp) if possible. -- Shunsuke Sogame