7 Jul
2004
7 Jul
'04
4:08 p.m.
"David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message news:u658z4xrh.fsf@boost-consulting.com...
Well, it might.
But then, the user knows he's using the initialization library, and operator, has a different meaning in that context, just like operator<< means something else in the context of a Spirit gramar.
I see. So I'd like to make a quick poll for Boosters: Overloading the comma operator in a way that could change order of evaluation of its arguments is: a) an obsolete coding standard b) a valid coding standard c) a valid coding standard, but for reasons x, y, and z, the initialization library doesn't violate it/violates it but gets away with it/etc. Thanks! Andrei