7 Jul
2020
7 Jul
'20
3:19 p.m.
On 07/07/2020 16:05, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Niall Douglas wrote:
We discussed whether adding an alternative naming for copy_exception() could be called a major change.
It is both major (API change) and potentially breaking (code that already defines its own make_exception_ptr may break).
Do you mean injecting a make_exception_ptr() into the boost namespace?
"We discussed" carries no weight unless one of the participants in said discussion was a release manager.
Our discussion was in good faith. Nothing was meant. If you want it rolled back, that's also fine. Niall