Dmitry Shesterkin wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for rising thread. I don't understand the rules for accepting patches. If anyone hasn't answered to my previous message does it mean that the patch won't be accepted?
Is there any procedure for accepting patches, which I should follow?
Thanks for advice, Dmitry
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 03:27:01 +0400, Dmitry Shesterkin <dfb@yandex.ru> wrote:
Hello,
... So, This patch introduces new flag boost::archive::skip_unknown_tail_tags. When this flag is set and basic_xml_iarchive is faced with unknown tags at the end of element it will skip them (include nested). ... Therefore, if the first version software set skip_unknown_tail_tags it can read second version of file (if does not set then exception will be thrown).
See patch in attachments for details. Could it be useful, and should it be merged in trunk?
Thanks in advance, Dmitry
The basic rule is: "Only those who can be responsable for supporting the library can be authorised to add patches." I've taken a cursory look at your patch and have found it iteresting. You can open a track item with this enhancement proposal so it doesn't get lost. Robert Ramey