10 Mar
2016
10 Mar
'16
10:42 p.m.
On 11/03/2016 07:52, Paul Fultz II wrote:
On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 12:42:59 AM UTC-6, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Paul if the scope of the library is high order function I propose to rename it to Boost.HighOrderFunctions. We could use boost::hof as name space and boost/hof/ as folder.
The adaptors and decorators are HOFs, and the other functions are used to help when using HOFs, so it does make sense to name it Boost.HighOrderFunctions. I like this name.
Or perhaps, HighOrderFunctionLibrary? HOFL:HOFL:HOFL:HOFL ___^___ _ L __/ [] \ LOL===__ \ L \___ ___ ___] I I ----------/ (I regret nothing.)