20 Nov
2004
20 Nov
'04
8:45 p.m.
At 01:07 AM 11/20/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> writes:
2. Even if it is well-recognized, I think it would be terrible to be tied down to that logo forever just because people currently recognize it: it's not a very good logo. I mean that it doesn't do what a logo should. I remember what the Spirit logo looks like better than I remember the Boost logo, and I've had way more exposure to the latter.
I guess it is a matter of personal taste. To me the current logo is much more memorable, and does exactly what we want it to do - tie the Boost name to C++ in a graphical form that is more visual than a pure text representation. --Beman