Re: [boost] [hash2][review] Early review (due to holidays)

Vinnie Falco wrote:

On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 7:33 AM Peter Dimov mailto:pdimov@gmail.com > wrote:

No, the public-facing design doesn't change. `BOOST_CXX14_CONSTEXPR` is replaced by the less ugly `constexpr` and that's pretty much it.

My next question is for those individuals who proclaim that requiring C++14 and later is ok. What is the specific rationale you used to determine whether the loss of users is worth the benefit of "BOOST_CXX14_CONSTEXPR replaced by the less ugly constexpr`?"

They don't need a rationale. I'm asking their opinions on whether a C++14 requirement would be fine _for them_. Not asking them to speculate whether a C++14 requirement wouldn't be fine _for some unspecified other people_.