25 Sep
2015
25 Sep
'15
3:07 p.m.
Andrzej Krzemienski wrote
I would like to inquire if there would be an interest in Boost in another library for storing optional objects, but working under different design goals.
[...]
For the motivation and design rationale see this article: https://akrzemi1.wordpress.com/2015/07/15/efficient-optional-values/
Any feedback is welcome.
Such a type would be extremely useful for me. This is exactly what I want most of my optional<bool>'s and optional<int>'s to be. -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/compact-optional-prompting-interest-tp468... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.