4 Nov
2011
4 Nov
'11
3:51 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Richard Hadsell <hadsell@blueskystudios.com> wrote:
On 11/01/2011 12:20 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Adding a (size_t) constructor would produce ambiguity errors, but those are easy to fix by using the default constructor instead. Would that be acceptable?
That sounds like a good idea.
Great. Does anyone else have comments / concerns about a (size_t) constructor? -- Olaf