Hi Peter, On 2015-06-01 18:06, Peter Dimov wrote:
I cited Metaparse as an argument that char packs are quite obviously practical if they work in practice, and was asked whether measurement data has been presented as part of the formal review, perhaps compared to alternatives.
I'm not aware of any alternatives to Metaparse though, so this question may be hard to answer. :-)
Either way, the only performance data I see is
http://abel.web.elte.hu/mpllibs/metaparse/performance.html
which seems rather slim. Is there any other?
Measurements: - http://abel.sinkovics.hu/download.php?fn=dsltemp.pdf section 5.3 - https://github.com/boostcon/cppnow_presentations_2012/blob/master/tue/metapa... starting at slide 157: memory footprint + compilation time - http://abel.sinkovics.hu/download.php?fn=2014_dsl.pdf slide 268 ("Compile-time parsing" is about Metaparse)
(On an unrelated note, the cpp-next.com link is dead, but archive.org still has it at http://web.archive.org/web/20140217173026/http://cpp-next.com/archive/2012/1...).
Thank you for pointing this out. I've fixed the URL. Regards, Ábel