Not entirely true ;) Its consistent with iostream, but not DEFAULT iostream - only iostream with increased precision. One can accept the same behavior as iostream as not a bug only when they don't have to manipulate iostream (ie. increase precision) to reveal said bug. But another way, one expects ss << d; ss >> s; to work identically to s = lexical_cast<string>(d); They DON'T expect ss.precision(digit10+1); ss << d; ss >> s; to be the equivalent. Just my $.02 :) PreZ On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 22:47:57 +0400, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
If it's broken in 1.33.1, then it's no my fault. I thought I introduced this bug when I increased precision to pass loopback test. I'm sure it's consistent with std::iostream behavior so it's not a bug :(
Preston A. Elder wrote:
I tried on 2 platforms:
RedHat AS4 (2.6 kernel), x86 gcc 3.4.4 and boost 1.33.1
Gentoo (2.6 kernel), amd64 gcc 4.1.1 and boost 1.33.1 AND CVS Head
All cases the same result.
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:52 +0400, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
In HEAD or 1.34? which compiler?