20 Apr
2017
20 Apr
'17
3:29 p.m.
Shouldn't libraries be removed from the incubator once they are part of boost? Why?
The Boost Incubator is called an incubator, so just starting from the name I thought it should only list libraries which are still incubated, not those already hatched and happily running about. There are some practical arguments as well: - Libraries accepted into Boost are listed on boost.org, so listing them also on blincubator seems unnecessary. - Duplicated records which need to be kept in sync manually tend to become inconsistent. - Having a shorter list on the blincubator makes scanning the list of projects by eye easier. Best regards, Hans