9 Oct
2004
9 Oct
'04
10:07 p.m.
On Oct 9, 2004, at 8:46 AM, Dave Harris wrote:
The second is a container of values which may be polymorphic. It would be a more-or-less drop-in replacement for vector<T>. It would not allow nulls, and the syntax would be like v.begin()->method(). Although it would probably use pointers behind the scenes, that would be an implementation detail not revealed by its interface.
I.e. a vector<T&> ? -Howard