On 12/10/2005 06:55 AM, Paul Mensonides wrote: [snip]
I haven't really been following this conversion, but why do you need an array at all? You have a sequence containing enumerator names. You can generate a switch statement just as easily as you can the enum itself:
switch (v) { case False: return "False"; case True: return "True"; // etc.
Regards, Paul Mensonides
Hmm... An array *seems* "cleaner" or "more object-oriented". I only say more "object-oriented" because switch statements were used before there were virtual functions. However, maybe that's my prejudice, and I'll admit "cleaner" and "more object-oriented" are pretty nebulous. Anyway, an example of generating such a switch statement is in vault under "Template Metaprogramming" in PP_RECFLD.zip. The array version of the same code is in little.funvec_.zip in little.funvec_constcvec.cpp.