Daniel Walker wrote:
I took a brief look at this. As far as I could tell Atry's library is stateless. So, it can only support a subset of the expressions that Boost.Lambda supports... namely those without state; i.e. all the parameters need to be unbound. So, it can do
_1 << _2 << _3
... but not ...
cout << _1 << endl
I'm not sure that this wins you a time savings over Boost.Lambda,
If stateful lambda object isn't small enough to fit into boost::function buffer, it could save you one dynamic memory allocation for each object.
but I believe it could win you a space saving if the static function can be inlined. Or quite the opposite. Though, I hope people don't write big scary lambdas expressions.
I wonder how this relates to the anticipated rewrite of lambda using Phoenix. me either.
-- Alexander Nasonov - http://nasonov.blogspot.com How we spend our days is, of course, how we spend our lives. -- Annie Dillard -- /---------------------------- Fortune script ----------------------------\ curl 'http://www.quotedb.com/quote/quote.php?action=random_quote&=&=&' | \ sed -e "s/^[^']*'//;s/.);$/ --/;s/<[^>]*>//g;2s/^.\{17\}//" | fmt