2 May
2008
2 May
'08
3:06 p.m.
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:44 AM, Bruno Lalande <bruno.lalande@gmail.com> wrote:
template <int I> value() const;
Could you just specialize boost::get?
I'm not sure to understand. Do you mean that you'd like the point concept to require that the provided point is accessible by boost::get?
Yes, although I still maintain that it shouldn't be called a PointConcept. You show your "value" template function that does basically the same thing as boost::get. Instead of: brunos::value<0>(myvec); it should be: boost::get<0>(myvec); IMHO... --Michael Fawcett