
12 Apr
2005
12 Apr
'05
7:06 a.m.
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
what if the member is any other range?
I'm saying the decision to overload hash_value for arrays seems a bit arbitrary.
Ranges that aren't part of the standard can supply their own overloads. The library currently only supports built in types and members of 'std'. Ideally overloads of hash_value for other boost libraries should be contained in the other library (I'm thinking about creating a separate header which contains the bare minimum includes to do this). Daniel