28 Sep
2004
28 Sep
'04
9:26 p.m.
It basically your choice, but why wouldn't you. I keep repeating during formal reviews that test programs could be enhanced here and there would you use Boost.Test (and all it's tools).
I'd rather change it to use at least the minimal test framework, otherwise I don't see how these results are interpreted. But then I don't know if there is someone expecting the particular format of this result and parsing it. If that's the case, my "fix" will we interpreted as a failure.
Fernando Cacciola SciSoft
Boost.Test is safe bet in this regard. Test program output will definitely be accepted and processed properly but Boost.Build. Gennadiy.