On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:04:07 -0500 Michael Glassford <glassfordm@hotmail.com> wrote:
For what it's worth, I'm hoping to investigate what it would take to make Boost.Thread support a static library option again in the future. If such a thing ever happened (no promises), it would have to be a version in which features that require the dll are disabled.
Mike, this is a rather conservative estimate I think. As I already have tried to show you that this can be done without any omission of features at all. Altough at the price of the application creating a (hidden, temporary) file on the target machine. I am currently trying to create a local modification of the threading library with static linkage, that has full function. I think I should send this to the list for discussion then. (BTW, the DLL version can be left totally unaltered.) Roland