Andrew Sutton wrote:
I think all potential mentors should rate as many applications as they find time to evaluate. It's the mentors who will collectively decide how to rank applications, and thus, which ones will get selected. This may involve not only individual ranking, but also some internal discussion.
Agreed. Also, I think it might be nice to write a short explanation of grades we're giving. Last time I checked, it's not good etiquette to reject a research paper from publication "just because".
Yes. The GSoC web application has a 'public' checkbox for reviews. If we don't check that, comments will be 'private' (meaning: only seen by mentors), so we may put annotations there. I'm not sure what other medium we may use for such 'internal' discussions. Regards, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...