12 Mar
2005
12 Mar
'05
8:44 p.m.
Andreas Huber wrote:
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
I forgot to respond to part of your message.
What I would like to see in the rationale is a comparison of a small handful (2-5) of alternate implementation technique, either approaches taken by other libraries or approaches you tried yourself early in development, together with an explanation of why they fail to satisfy the requirements.
That's interesting. I was under the impression that exactly such a list of alternate implementation techniques would not satisfy you, because it would in no way show that the design I chose is the best performance-wise.
Why not? That would be the main point.
And performance was your biggest concern, wasn't it?
Yes. Jonathan