Ben Artin wrote:
I mind the disappearing underlines because they make links on the two
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:57:56 -0400, Beth Jacobson wrote parts of
the page act *completely* opposite from each other.
That was actually what I liked about them. I thought it made a nice inverse correspondence. Still, they serve no real purpose and are non-standard, so if some people are finding them confusing or even just annoying, that's probably sufficient reason to take them out. I won't change the test page because they don't really interfere with people's ability to evaluate the rest of the changes, but at this point I'm thinking they probably don't belong in the final version.
I think the new color scheme is the best I've seen -- I'd ship it. We should leave the underlines -- I agree with the comment that the color by itself is too subtle. I could go either way on the disappering behavior. The nice part is that it gives feedback that you are over the link. But no big deal either way. Thx Beth for jumping in with some fresh ideas -- and of course thx to Rene for all the prior work... Jeff