Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?

"Beman Dawes" <bdawes@acm.org> wrote in message news:dpsa4b$in6$1@sea.gmane.org...

I'm gettng pestered by the automatic regression test failure notification system about Boost.Filesystem with GCC 2.95.3.

Does anyone still care?

I could just mark all the failures as expected, but if no one cares anymore then we ought to stop testing 2.95.3, free up the testing resources and stop pestering Boost developers about 2.95.3 failures.

--Beman

I support this. Pre 3.0.0 release is a cause for huge number of workarounds. Specifically related to classic IO and weak templates support. Lets get rid of these. Gennadiy