11 Sep
2006
11 Sep
'06
12:17 p.m.
Zak Kipling wrote:
From discussion on the above bug page, it appears unclear whether this or not this code is actually legal... has the patch broken something which should be expected to work, or are the existing versions of gcc and Comeau accepting illegal code?
It looks borderline to me: I suspect that gcc is correct in complaining about this, of course that doesn't mean it *has* to diagnose this as an error, simply that it is probably permitted to do so. Any other opinions? John.