JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin <at> tid.es> writes:
----- Mensaje original ----- De: Peter Dimov <pdimov <at> pdimov.com> Fecha: Domingo, Diciembre 16, 2007 8:27 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] [flyweight] some minor comments Para: boost <at> lists.boost.org
[...]
As I read it, a flyweight<> can ignore all of its template parameters beyond T and still conform to its spec, which is probably not what's intended.
I tried to be more descriptive than prescriptive so as to not overspecifiy the internals of flyweight<>, but you're right the formal connection between flyweight<> and its template arguments has to be given. I'll try to improve this part of the reference.
I've tried to improve on that point, please see http://tinyurl.com/345s5w and http://tinyurl.com/2s3plu . Does it look better now to you? Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo