9 Mar
2011
9 Mar
'11
9:41 p.m.
El 09/03/2011 21:32, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. escribió:
By "should fail", you mean "should fail to compile, according to the standard", and here "value" is not an object of the std::list value_type, but some other type that's convertible to value_type, correct? Again, just to clarify.
Right. The idea is also to have some macro to ease writing the same code for both C++03 and C++0x, e.g., priv_push_back receives a BOOST_FWD_REF param that can be forwarded both in C++03 and C++0x.
Yes, it's a bit more ugly, but if you were to document this as a general technique or recommendation, I would ultimately let the container author decide whether to allow "placement construction".
Yes, this is a good idea. Best, Ion