Rob Stewart wrote:
Would "some_of" be a better name than "n_m_of?" The latter isn't the most inventive name and I was hoping to find something better (if there is anything). Both would be parameterized with two values (min and max). I know "some" is quite vague, like "any," but the required parameters would force supplying the minimum and maximum.
We could also try "min_max_of," but that suggests a function that returns a pair of values.
"n_m_of" uses anti-alphabetical ordering of the letters. That rather suggests the template argument order of maximum then minimum. Perhaps changing to "x_y_of" or "a_z_of" would be better?
How about 'subrange_of'? 'subset_of' would sound better, but 'subrange' indicates that the desired subset would be min/max bounded. Matt