29 Nov
2004
29 Nov
'04
10:39 p.m.
"Joaquín Mª López Muñoz" wrote:
John, now that you're at is_abstract, I wonder whether you could consider adding some workaround in is_abstract.hpp making boost::is_abstract return unconditionally false for those compilers known not to work for it. You can read about the origin of this request at:
Wouldn't it be better to have macro like BOOST_NO_XYZ defined for failing compilers instead? (I once suggested BOOST_NO_SUPPORT_FOR_DR337 but it was seen less then descriptive.) /Pavel